Sunday, February 17, 2019
CASE: Paul Cronan and New England Telephone Company (A) Essay -- Legal
illustration Paul Cronan and New England Telephone Company (A)I.LEGAL CASE digestA.FactsPaul Cronan was hired by New England Telephone (NET) in 1973 as a file clerk. In 1983 he was promoted to service technician. He worked in Needham, Massachusetts for 18 months before transferring to South Boston, Massachusetts. In 1985, Cronan suffered from medical symptoms delinquent to AIDS-related complex (ARC), and missed work sporadically for 6 months. In June, 1985 Cronan call for a third leave of absence from work for a gets appointment. Cronans supervisor, Charles OBrian, demanded to know the nature of the illness, and assured him that the entropy would be kept confidential. Cronan informed OBrian that the illness was AIDS-related, whereupon he veritable the work excuse to see his doctor. OBrien informed his supervisor, Paul Cloran, of Cronans AIDS status, who in turn informed his own supervisor. The following day, in accordance with company policy, OBrien mandated that Cronan see th e company physician. After a 10 minute sensual examination Cronan was sent home.Two geezerhood later, a coworker informed Cronan that news of his AIDS-related illness had spread around his co-workers, and that threats of physical violence were made against Cronan should he bring forth. Fearing for his safety and health, Cronan requested medical leave, which was granted. He began receiving company-paid medical benefits, first departmental sickness benefits, then illness benefits. distemper benefits were extended several times to 12 months total.In August 1985, Cronan wished to bring forth to work. His new supervisor, Richard griffon vulture, stated that in accordance with company policy a medical protection from his physician certifying his ability to return to work was required. Cronan obtained the certificate but also requested a transfer to another location. He did not receive a response to his request and did not return to the South Boston facility, fearing that he would b e physically harmed.In kinfolk 1985, Cronan was hospitalized with AIDS. During this hospitalization he received a letter of condolence from Griffin offering a return to his previous position with no hang of a transfer or new assignment. In December 1985, Cronan filed a lawsuit assisted by the Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts for $1.45 jillion in state court, alleging invasion of privacy and ... ...cable illness that puts the workers at pretend or requires medical evaluation. Even if the dissemination of this private information were inadvertent, processes should be in place to prevent such occurrences. The potential for the development of bigotry or a hostile work environment requires an ethical response. The foreknowledge of Cronans anticipated return to work at NET in any capacity mandates that he be allowed to work in a harmonious and safe environment. As ignorance was the main impetus for the majority of the behaviors illustrious by Cronan, education would be the so lution. The ethical course of action would be initially providing widespread company dissemination of the policy regarding AIDS in the body of work, followed by intense education of the workers about AIDS. An overall policy of superstition of any harassment should be published and enforced.Finally, the ethical response to Cronan apiece in the situation as listed in the narrative would be to move up him a position constrained only by the limits of his medical aim where he would find job satisfaction in a workplace environment free of hostility and sexual harassment, with relocation provided if necessary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment