“The Singer Solution to World Poverty”

World poverty has existed for many centuries and still exists today, gradually expanding and intensifying. This is the division that Pete Singer, a professor of bioethics, calls attention to in his article The Singer Solution to World Poverty. Singer claimed that the solution was simple whatever money youre spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away. Considering Singers solution a controversial point arises surrounded by an idealistic, utopian, and morally just point of hatful and a realistic, pragmatic, and plausible point of view.Singers solution, although righteous and ethical, is not probable and thus would not be effective in curing world poverty. The hardly a(prenominal) pros of Singers proposal are, at first glance, important and convincing. The money, prospering individuals are spending on luxuries, groundwork total to a great amount, which chiffonier help pay for food and medical aid for the poor. With an increase of food and medicine, the rate at w hich children and adults die due to starvation and lack of medical help, can quickly decrease.Nations will less frequently struggle with high mortality rate among newly born and children as well as among adult good deal suffering from curable diseases. In addition, the donated money can allow for the improvement of educational opportunities for all individuals, which can result in advanced technological, scientific and humanities-focused search and discoveries. Ultimately, Singers utopian idea of a cure for world poverty, promises a developed, healthy, and educated world.Although Singer deals with morality and righteousness, one cannot help but pink Singers idealism and naivety and resort to realism, practicality and plausibility. The first issue that comes to light when attempting to execute or enforce this solution is the unknown borderline between luxury and necessity. In reality, it would be impossible for every prosperous person to agree upon what is and what is not a necess ity, and if it were decided, for example that microwaves were a luxury, would the microwave manufacturers go appear of business?A large percentage of companies and factories are dedicated to manufacturing luxurious items, however, if people no longer continued to buy these items and instead donated to the poor, this would be at the cost of the factory workers jobs therefore, creating a cyclical effect and intensifying the issue of world poverty. Accordingly, Singer gives a highly idealistic and utopian theory and when we guess both pros and cons, it becomes obvious that the obstacles outweigh the advantages.His approach in curing world poverty is not only too extreme, but brings about cyclical and unsolvable issues. It is important to consider and apply this method to real life and then reflect upon all the possible consequences. Singers cure fails to provide a realistic solution and promising outcomes. A different approach, or rather first step, to solving world poverty can be k eeping to a minimum expensive worldwide projects. For example, millions of dollars are spent on the opening and closing ceremonies of the Olympics, World Soccer Cups, etc.If instead the total money dedicated to these celebrations were to be saved and donated to the needy every few years, progress would certainly be a result. Moreover, the ceremonies can be replaced with simple, yet entertaining concerts performed by artists willing to propose and help fund-raise money for the poor. Ultimately, Singers simple formula for world poverty in reality is a naive and idealist theory, and roughly importantly an ill-considered and unfitting solution to one of the 21st centurys greatest issue world poverty.